Let be \( t \in \mathbb{N} \) a natural number.
This number \(t\) will be used to theoretically let start series from any index.
-
If both series converge$$ \forall \bigl(a_n, \ b_n\bigr),$$$$ \sum a_n \text{ and } \sum b_n \text{ converges } \Longrightarrow \sum (a_n + b_n) \text{ converges } $$$$ \Longrightarrow $$$$ \sum_{k = t}^{+ \infty} (a_k + b_k) = \sum_{k = t}^{+ \infty} a_k + \sum_{k = t}^{+ \infty} b_k $$
-
If one of the series diverge$$ \forall \bigl(a_n, \ b_n\bigr),$$$$ \sum a_n \text{ converges and } \sum b_n \text{ diverges } \Longrightarrow \sum (a_n + b_n) \text{ diverges } $$
For any couples of series \(\bigl(c_n, \ d_n\bigr)\) habing an indentical and constant sign from a certain index:
Moreover, if \((l = 1)\) both sequences are equivalent , then:
Let be \( t \in \mathbb{N} \) a natural number.
This number \(t\) will be used to theoretically let start series from any index.
Scalar multiplication
Let \( (a_n) \) be a numerical sequence and \(\lambda \in \mathbb{R}\) a real number.
Suppose that the series \(\sum a_n\) converges to a limit \(l\), which is expressed by the limit of its partial sums:
Let us consider the sequence of partial sums of the series \(\sum (\lambda \ a_n)\). For any integer \(n \geqslant t\), the linearity properties of finite sums allow us to factor out the scalar coefficient:
Taking the limit as \(n \to +\infty\) and applying the general limit laws, we obtain the following chain of equalities:
The sequence of partial sums admits a finite limit equal to \(\lambda \ l\), which proves the convergence of the series.
Thus, finally:
Addition
Let be \( \bigl(a_n, \ b_n \bigr) \) two numerical sequences.
-
If both series converge
In the same way as before, if \(\sum a_n\) and \(\sum b_n\) converge, then:
$$ \exists! \ (l, l') \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{R}^2, \ \left \{ \begin{gather*} \lim_{n \to + \infty} \sum_{k = t}^{n} a_k = l \\ \\ \lim_{n \to + \infty}\sum_{k = t}^{n} b_k = l' \end{gather*} \right \} $$So by adding the two expressions, we have:
$$ \lim_{n \to + \infty} \sum_{k = t}^{n} a_k + \lim_{n \to + \infty} \sum_{k = t}^{n} b_k = l + l' $$The limit of a sum being the sum of the limits:
$$ \forall (f, \ g),$$$$\lim (f+g) =\lim (f) +\lim (g) $$So now we have this:
$$ \lim_{n \to + \infty} \biggl[ \sum_{k = t}^{n} a_k + \sum_{k = t}^{n} b_k \biggr] = l + l' $$$$ \lim_{n \to + \infty} \biggl[ \sum_{k = t}^{n} (a_k + b_k) \biggr] = l + l' $$Therefore, we obtain that \(\sum (a_k + b_k) \) converge towards \((l + l')\).
So,
$$ \forall \bigl(a_n, \ b_n\bigr),$$$$ \sum a_n \text{ and } \sum b_n \text{ converges } \Longrightarrow \sum (a_n + b_n) \text{ converges } $$$$ \Longrightarrow $$$$ \sum_{k = t}^{+ \infty} (a_k + b_k) = \sum_{k = t}^{+ \infty} a_k + \sum_{k = t}^{+ \infty} b_k $$ -
If one of the series diverge
Suppose that the series \(\sum a_n\) converges to a real number \(l\) and that the series \(\sum b_n\) diverges.
By contradiction, if the sum series \(\sum (a_n + b_n)\) were convergent and tended toward a limit \(L\), then by linearity of summation, the following difference series should also converge to \(L - l\):
$$ \sum_{k=t}^n b_k = \sum_{k=t}^n \bigl[ (a_k + b_k) - a_k \bigr] $$Taking the limit of the partial sums, we would obtain:
$$ \lim_{n \to +\infty} \sum_{k=t}^n b_k = \lim_{n \to +\infty} \sum_{k=t}^n (a_k + b_k) - \lim_{n \to +\infty} \sum_{k=t}^n a_k = L - l $$Since the right-hand side is a fixed real number (\(L - l\)), the sequence of partial sums of \(b_n\) would admit a finite limit, meaning that the series \(\sum b_n\) would converge.
This directly contradicts our initial hypothesis. Therefore:
Thus,
$$ \forall \bigl(a_n, \ b_n\bigr),$$$$ \sum a_n \text{ converges and } \sum b_n \text{ diverges } \Longrightarrow \sum (a_n + b_n) \text{ diverges } $$
Identification of series having the same nature
Let \((c_n, d_n)\) be two sequences having strictly positive terms from the index \(t\), and \(l \in \mathbb{R}^*_+ \) a real number such as:
Invoking the definition of a limit, it is possible to find two positives real numbers \((l_1, l_2) \in (\mathbb{R}_+)^2\) such as:
By multiplying all terms by \(d_n\), we do obtain this:
Now, we saw above a property which tells us that for a series associated with a sequence \((a_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}\)
-
If \(\sum d_n\) converge
If \(\sum d_n\) converge, then it is the same thing for \(\sum (l_2 \ d_n)\).
In addition to that, the series \(\sum c_n\) being lower than a convergent series, it also converges.
$$ \lim_{n \to + \infty} \left[ \frac{c_n}{d_n} \right] = l > 0 \Longrightarrow \text{\(\sum d_n\) converge \(\Longrightarrow \sum c_n\) converge} $$Note :
If both series have strictly negative terms, inequalities direction change:
$$ \sum_{k=t}^n (l_1 \ d_k) > \sum_{k=t}^n c_k > \sum_{k=t}^n (l_2 \ d_k) $$But the series \(\sum c_n\) is still trapped by \(\sum d_n\), and the result is the same.
-
If \(\sum d_n\) diverge
Likewise, if \(\sum d_n\) diverge, then it is the same thing for \(\sum (l_1 \ d_n)\).
In the same way, the series \(\sum c_n\) being greater than a divergent series, it also diverges.
$$ \lim_{n \to + \infty} \left[ \frac{c_n}{d_n} \right] = l > 0 \Longrightarrow \text{\(\sum d_n\) diverge \(\Longrightarrow \sum c_n\) diverge} $$Remarque :
If both series have strictly negative terms, the result is still the same for the same reasons.
And as a result,
For any couples of series \(\bigl(c_n, \ d_n\bigr)\) habing an indentical and constant sign from a certain index:
Moreover, if \((l = 1)\) both sequences are equivalent :
We will have as a bonus:
Back to top