Let \( \bigl(a_n, b_n\bigr) \) be two numerical sequences.
Let \( n \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{N} \) be a natural number.
-
Simple sum
-
Reversing direction
$$ \forall n \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{N},$$$$ \sum_{k = 0}^n a_k = \sum_{i = 0}^n a_{n - i} $$ -
Shift to zero
$$ \forall (p, n) \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{N}^2, \enspace p \leqslant n, $$$$ \sum_{k = p}^n a_k = \sum_{i = 0}^{n - p} a_{p + i} $$
-
-
Double sum
-
Sum which not depend of indexes
In the case of a double sum indexed by a rectangle \( [\![1,m]\!] \times [\![1,n]\!] \):
$$ \forall (m,n) \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{N}^2,$$$$ \sum_{i = 1}^m \sum_{j = 1}^n a_{i,j} = \sum_{j = 1}^n \sum_{i = 1}^m a_{i, j} $$ -
Sum which do depend of indexes
In the case of a double triangular sum :
$$ \forall n \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{N},$$$$ \sum_{1 \leqslant i \leqslant j \leqslant n}^n \Bigl[ a_{i,j} \Bigr] = \sum_{i = 1}^n \sum_{j = i}^n a_{i, j} = \sum_{j = 1}^n \sum_{i = 1}^j a_{i, j} $$
-
When subtracting two consecutive terms within a sum, we can perform a telescoping of terms :
Proofs
Let \( \bigl(a_n, b_n\bigr) \) be two numerical sequences.
Linearity
Let be \( (\lambda , \mu) \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{R}^2 \) two real numbers. We start with the following sum:
This sum can be separated into two elements:
By expanding the sums, we can factor the coefficients:
And finally,
Change of index
-
Simple sum
Let \( n \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{N} \) be a natural number.
-
Reversing direction
Let \( p \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{N} \) be a natural number with \((p \leqslant n)\).
We start with the following sum:
$$ \sum_{k = 0}^n a_k = a_0 + a_1 + \ ... \ + \hspace{0.2em} a_{n - 1} + a_n $$Then we reverse the direction:
$$ \sum_{k = 0}^n a_k = a_n + a_{n - 1} + \ ... \ + \hspace{0.2em} a_1 + a_0 $$And finally,
$$ \forall n \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{N},$$$$ \sum_{k = 0}^n a_k = \sum_{i = 0}^n a_{n - i} $$ -
Shift to zero
We start with the following sum:
$$ \sum_{k = p}^n a_k = a_p + a_{p + 1} + \ ... \ + \hspace{0.2em} a_{n - 1} + a_n $$Arranging the indexes, we have:
$$ \sum_{k = p}^n a_k = a_{p + 0} + a_{p + 1} + \ ... \ + \hspace{0.2em} a_{p + (n - p - 1)} + a_{p + (n - p)} $$And finally,
$$ \forall (p, n) \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{N}^2, \enspace p \leqslant n, $$$$ \sum_{k = p}^n a_k = \sum_{i = 0}^{n - p} a_{p + i} $$
-
-
Double sum
Let \( (m,n) \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{N}^2 \) be two natural numbers.
-
Sum which not depend of indexes
We start from the following double sum, indexed by a rectangle \( [\![1,m]\!] \times [\![1,n]\!] \):
$$ \sum_{i = 1}^m \sum_{j = 1}^n a_{i,j} $$$$ \sum_{i = 1}^m \sum_{j = 1}^n a_{i,j} = \sum_{i = 1}^m \left( a_{i, 1} + a_{i, 2} + \ ... \ + \hspace{0.2em} a_{i, n} \right) $$$$ \sum_{i = 1}^m \sum_{j = 1}^n a_{i,j} = \sum_{i = 1}^m a_{i, 1} + \sum_{i = 1}^m a_{i, 2} \hspace{0.2em} + \hspace{0.2em} ... \hspace{0.2em} + \hspace{0.2em} \sum_{i = 1}^m a_{i, m} $$We notice that it is the same sum by reversing the indices.
So, for double sums where each of the sums does not depend on the indexes , we can easily switch the sum symbols:
$$ \sum_{i = 1}^m \sum_{j = 1}^n a_{i,j} = \sum_{j = 1}^n \sum_{i = 1}^m a_{i, j} $$De manière visuelle, on peu voir que faire la sommes des lignes ou la somme des colonnes reviendra au même.
Indice \(i\)Indice \(j\)$$ 1 $$$$ 2 $$$$ 3 $$$$ ... $$$$ n $$$$ 1 $$$$ a_{1,1} $$$$ a_{1,2} $$$$ a_{1,3} $$$$ ... $$$$ a_{1,n} $$$$ 2 $$$$ a_{2,1} $$$$ a_{2,2} $$$$ a_{2,3} $$$$ ... $$$$ a_{2,n} $$$$ 3 $$$$ a_{3,1} $$$$ a_{3,2} $$$$ a_{3,3} $$$$ ... $$$$ a_{3,n} $$$$ ... $$$$ ... $$$$ ... $$$$ ... $$$$ ... $$$$ ... $$$$ m $$$$ a_{m,1} $$$$ a_{m,2} $$$$ a_{m,3} $$$$ ... $$$$ a_{m,n} $$ -
Sum which do depend of indexes
We start from the following double triangular sum:
$$ \sum_{1 \leqslant i \leqslant j \leqslant n}^n \Bigl[ a_{i,j} \Bigr] $$It is the double sum where we always have \( (i \leqslant j) \).
-
Line vision
By adopting a line vision, we have:
$$ \sum_{1 \leqslant i \leqslant j \leqslant n}^n \Bigl[ a_{i,j} \Bigr] = \textcolor{rgb(118 139 240)}{a_{1,1} + a_{1,2} + a_{1,3} + \ ... \ + \hspace{0.2em} a_{1,n}} + \textcolor{rgb(93 183 129)}{a_{2,2} + a_{2,3} \hspace{0.2em} + \ ... \ + \hspace{0.2em} a_{2,n}} + \textcolor{rgb(232 124 124)}{a_{3,3} \hspace{0.2em} + \hspace{0.2em} ... \hspace{0.2em} + \hspace{0.2em} a_{3,n}} + \textcolor{rgb(197 144 218)}{a_{n,n}} $$Indice \(i\)Indice \(j\)$$ 1 $$$$ 2 $$$$ 3 $$$$ ... $$$$ n $$$$ 1 $$$$ a_{1,1} $$$$ a_{1,2} $$$$ a_{1,3} $$$$ ... $$$$ a_{1,n} $$$$ 2 $$$$ $$$$ a_{2,2} $$$$ a_{2,3} $$$$ ... $$$$ a_{2,n} $$$$ 3 $$$$ $$$$ $$$$ a_{3,3} $$$$ ... $$$$ a_{3,n} $$$$ ... $$$$ $$$$ $$$$ $$$$ ... $$$$ ... $$$$ n $$$$ $$$$ $$$$ $$$$ $$$$ a_{n,n} $$All these elements are the sum closed on the index \(i\), in which each sum-term starts at \((j = i)\) :
$$ \sum_{1 \leqslant i \leqslant j \leqslant n}^n \Bigl[ a_{i,j} \Bigr] = \textcolor{rgb(118 139 240)}{\sum_{j = 1}^n a_{1,j}} + \textcolor{rgb(93 183 129)}{\sum_{j = 2}^n a_{2,j}} + \textcolor{rgb(232 124 124)}{\sum_{j = 3}^n a_{3,j}} \hspace{0.2em} + \hspace{0.2em} ... \hspace{0.2em} + \hspace{0.2em} \textcolor{rgb(213 101 255)}{\sum_{j = n}^n a_{n,j}} $$And as a result,
$$ \sum_{1 \leqslant i \leqslant j \leqslant n}^n \Bigl[ a_{i,j} \Bigr] = \sum_{i = 1}^n \sum_{j = i}^n a_{i, j} $$ -
Column vision
By adopting a column view, we obtain the sum in this form:
$$ \sum_{1 \leqslant i \leqslant j \leqslant n}^n \Bigl[ a_{i,j} \Bigr] = \textcolor{rgb(118 139 240)}{a_{1,1}} + \textcolor{rgb(54 152 46)}{a_{1,2} + a_{2,2}} + \textcolor{rgb(232 124 124)}{a_{1,3} + a_{2,3} + a_{3,3}} + \ ... \ + \hspace{0.2em} \textcolor{rgb(197 144 218)}{a_{1,n} + a_{2,n} + a_{3,n} + \ ... \ + \hspace{0.2em} a_{n,n}} $$All these elements are the sum closed on the index \(j\), in which each sum term goes at most to \((i = j)\) :
$$ \sum_{1 \leqslant i \leqslant j \leqslant n}^n \Bigl[ a_{i,j} \Bigr] = \textcolor{rgb(118 139 240)}{\sum_{i = 1}^1 a_{i,1}} + \textcolor{rgb(93 183 129)}{\sum_{i = 1}^2 a_{i,2}} + \textcolor{rgb(232 124 124)}{\sum_{i = 1}^3 a_{i,3}} \hspace{0.2em} + \hspace{0.2em} ... \hspace{0.2em} + \hspace{0.2em} \textcolor{rgb(213 101 255)}{\sum_{i = 1}^n a_{i,n}} $$And as a result,
$$ \sum_{1 \leqslant i \leqslant j \leqslant n}^n \Bigl[ a_{i,j} \Bigr] = \sum_{j = 1}^n \sum_{i = 1}^j a_{i, j} $$
So, for double sums where each of the sum s depends on indexes , we can make the following change of variable:
$$ \forall n \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{N},$$$$ \sum_{1 \leqslant i \leqslant j \leqslant n}^n \Bigl[ a_{i,j} \Bigr] = \sum_{i = 1}^n \sum_{j = i}^n a_{i, j} = \sum_{j = 1}^n \sum_{i = 1}^j a_{i, j} $$ -
-
Telescoping of terms of a recurring numerical series
We want to calculate the series \( \sum \bigl [a_{k+1} - a_k \bigr] \) from \( k = 0 \) to \( n \).
We will have,
Arranging this expression, the terms will be annihilated one by one.
All that will remain is that the last minus the first of the series. So,
Example
-
Telescoping of terms
Let us calculate the partial sum of the following series:
$$S_n = \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k(k+1)}$$To carry out his calculation, we first need to turn this fraction into a partial fraction decomposition .
-
Partial fraction decomposition
Let set the \(F(X) \) function down:
$$F(X) = \frac{1}{X(X+1)} \qquad (F(X))$$We are looking for two reals \( a \) and \(b\) such as:
$$F(X) = \frac{a}{X} + \frac{b}{X+1}$$Putting in the same dénominateur, we do have:
$$F(X) = \frac{a(X+1) + b X}{X(X+1)} \qquad (\tilde{F}(X)) $$The idea here is to use both forms \( (F(X)) \) and \( (\tilde{F}(X)) \) to obtain an equivalence and determine \( a \) and \(b\), we do have:
$$F(X) X = \frac{1}{(X+1)} \qquad (F(X))$$$$F(X) X = \frac{a(X+1) + b X}{(X+1)} \qquad (\tilde{F}(X)) $$So,
$$ F(X) X = \frac{1}{(X+1)}= \frac{a(X+1) + b X}{(X+1)} $$$$ F(X) X = \frac{1}{(X+1)}= a + \frac{ b X}{(X+1)} $$Doing \( (X = 0)\), we determine \( a \):
$$ \underset{(X=0)}{F(X)} X = \frac{1}{(X+1)}= a \Longrightarrow (a = 1) $$We can do the same thong to determine \(b\), doing \( (X = -1)\) it will remain \( b \):
$$ \underset{(X=-1)}{F(X)} (X+1) = \frac{1}{X}= b \Longrightarrow (b = - 1) $$We then have our couple of solutions:
$$ \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} a = 1 \\ b = -1 \end{gather*} $$Thus, \(F(X) \) can be written:
$$F(X) = \frac{1}{X} - \frac{1}{X+1}$$ -
Calculation of the partial sum with telescoping
Thanks to the partial fraction decomposition , we do have now:
$$F(X) = \frac{1}{X(X+1)} =\frac{1}{X} - \frac{1}{X+1}$$Our series:
$$S_n = \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k(k+1)}$$becomes,
$$S_n = \sum_{k=0}^n \Biggl[ \frac{1}{k} - \frac{1}{k+1} \Biggr]$$We extract the \((-)\) sign to have a sequence under the form \( \bigl [a_{k+1} - a_k \bigr] \).
$$S_n = -\sum_{k=1}^n \Biggl[ \frac{1}{k+1} -\frac{1}{k} \Biggr]$$Let set down:
$$ a_k = \frac{1}{k} $$to obtain,
$$\sum_{k=1}^n \Biggl[ \frac{1}{k+1} -\frac{1}{k} \Biggr] = \sum_{k=0}^n \Bigl [a_{k+1} - a_k \Bigr]$$Then we apply:
$$\sum_{k=0}^n \Bigl [a_{k+1} - a_k \Bigr] = a_{n+1} - a_{0} $$We can now carry out the telescoping.
$$S_n = -\Biggl[ \frac{1}{n+1} -\frac{1}{1} \Biggr]$$$$S_n = 1 -\frac{1}{n+1} $$
-
Back to top