We write \( |z| \) the modulus of a complex number \( z \).
Let be \( (x, y) \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{R}^2, \enspace z \in \mathbb{C}, \enspace \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} z = x + iy \\ |z| = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 } \end{gather*} \)
In the same way, we will have:
Let be \( (x, y) \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{R}^2, \enspace z \in \mathbb{C}, \)
We write \( \arg(z) \) the argument of a cmplex number \( z \).
We write \( \overline{z} \) the conjugate of a complex number \( z \).
Let be \( (x, y) \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{R}^2, \enspace z \in \mathbb{C}, \enspace \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} z = x + iy \\ \overline{z} = x -iy \end{gather*} \)
In the same way,
Click on the title to access to the recap table.
Proofs
Moduli\(: |z|\)
Moduli of the opposite and the conjugate
Let us write the complex numbers \( |-z|\) et \( | \overline{z} | \) under their algebraic form.
And finally,
Modulus of a product
Let us write the complex numbers \( z, z' \) under their algebraic form.
Calculating \( z z' \), we do have:
Then, calculating \( | z z' | \):
In the end, calculating \( | z| \hspace{0.2em}. |z' | \) we do have:
We now notice that both expressions \( (1) \) and \( (2) \) are equals, so:
In the same way, we will have:
Modulus of a complex number raised to an integer power
Let \(z \in \mathbb{C}\).
Let us prove by induction that for any natural integer \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), the following property holds:
-
Initialization (for \(n = 0\))
By convention, for any complex number \(z \neq 0\), we have \(z^0 = 1\). Let us calculate both sides:
$$ \begin{cases} |z^0| = |1| = 1 \\ |z|^0 = 1 \end{cases} $$The equality holds, so the statement \((P_0)\) is true.
-
Inductive Step
Let \(k \in \mathbb{N}\) be a fixed natural integer. Suppose that the statement \((P_k)\) is true, i.e., that \(|z^k| = |z|^k\). Let us check if it remains true at rank \(k+1\), that is:
$$ \left|z^{k+1}\right| = |z|^{k+1} \qquad (P_{k+1}) $$By the laws of exponents, we know that \(z^{k+1} = z^k \times z\). Applying the modulus, we obtain:
$$ |z^{k+1}| = |z^k \times z| $$Now, we have previously proved that the modulus of a product is equal to the product of the moduli:
$$ \forall (z, z') \in \mathbb{C}^2, \enspace |z z'| = |z| \cdot |z'| $$This allows us to separate the product:
$$ |z^{k+1}| = |z^k| \cdot |z| $$Using our inductive hypothesis (\(|z^k| = |z|^k\)), we can substitute this term:
$$ |z^{k+1}| = |z|^k \cdot |z| = |z|^{k+1} $$The property is therefore inductive.
-
Conclusion
The statement \((P_n)\) is true at rank \(0\) and is inductive for any natural integer \(n\). By the principle of mathematical induction, we conclude that:
$$ \forall z \in \mathbb{C}, \enspace \forall n \in \mathbb{N}, $$$$ |z^n| = |z|^n $$
Arguments\(: \arg(z) \)
Arguments of conjugate and opposite
Let us write the complex number \(z\) under its trigonometric form.
-
For the conjugate \(\overline{z}\)
.Let us write the complex number \( \overline{z} \) under its trigonometric form.
$$\overline{z} = |z| \cdot \left( \cos(\theta) - i \hspace{0.2em} \sin(\theta) \right) $$But,
$$ \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} \cos(\theta) = \cos(-\theta) \\ -\sin(\theta) = \sin(-\theta) \end{gather*} $$So,
$$\overline{z} = |z| \cdot \left( \cos(-\theta) + i \sin(-\theta) \right) $$Hence,
$$ \arg(\overline{z}) = -\arg(z) $$ -
For the opposite \( -z \)
$$-z = -|z| \cdot \left( \cos(\theta) + i \hspace{0.2em} \sin(\theta) \right) $$$$-z = |z| \cdot \left( -\cos(\theta) - i \hspace{0.2em} \sin(\theta) \right) $$But,
$$ \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} -\cos(\theta) = \cos(\pi + \theta) \\ -\sin(\theta) = \sin(\pi + \theta) \end{gather*} $$So,
$$ -z = |z| \cdot \left( \cos(\pi + \theta) + isin(\pi + \theta) \right) $$Hence,
$$ \arg(-z) = \pi +\arg(z) $$
And as a result,
Argument of a product
Let us write the complex numbers \( z, z' \) under their trigonometric form.
Performing the product \( z z' \), we do obtain:
Thanks to the properties of the modulus \( | z | \) , we know that:
So,
Now, thanks to the trigonometric addition formulas , we know that:
So that,
And as a result,
Argument of an inverse
Let \(z \in \hspace{0.04em}\mathbb{C}^*\) be a non-zero complex number.
Let us start fro mthe following equation:
Then,
But, we know that the argument of a product is the sum of the product's factors of this product:
So that,
And finally,
Argument of a quotient
Let \(z \in \mathbb{C}\) be a complex number and \(z' \in \hspace{0.04em}\mathbb{C}^*\) a non-zero complex number.
Let us write the quotient \(\frac{z}{z'}\) in the form of a product:
But, we know that the argument of a product is the sum of the product's factors of this product:
So that,
Now, we know that the argument of the inverse of a complex number is the opposite this complex number's argument:
So,
And as a result,
Argument of a complex number raised to an integer power
Let us write the complex number \( z \) under its trigonometric form.
-
Calculating the square\(: z^2 \)
$$ z^2 = \Bigl[ |z| \cdot \left(\cos(\theta) + i \hspace{0.2em} \sin(\theta) \right) \Bigr]^2 $$Thanks to the properties of the modulus raised to an integer power \( | z^n | \) , we know that:
$$ \forall z \in \mathbb{C}, \enspace \forall n \in \mathbb{N}, $$$$ |z^n| = |z|^n $$So,
$$ z^2 = |z|^2.\left(\cos(\theta) + i \sin(\theta) \right)^2$$$$ z^2 = |z|^2.\left(\cos^2(\theta) + 2i.\sin(\theta)\cos(\theta) - \sin^2(\theta) \right)$$$$ z^2 = |z|^2.\left(\cos^2(\theta) - \sin^2(\theta) + 2i.\sin(\theta)\cos(\theta) \right)$$Now, thanks to trigonometric duplicaiton formulas , we know that:
$$ \forall \alpha \in \mathbb{R}, \enspace \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} \sin(2\alpha) = 2 \sin(\alpha) \cos(\alpha) \\ \cos(2\alpha) = \cos^2(\alpha) - \sin^2(\alpha) \end{gather*} $$Thus, we identify that:
$$ z^2 = |z|^2.\left(\cos(2\theta) + i .\sin(2\theta) \right)$$And,
$$ \arg(z^2) = 2 . \arg(z) $$ -
Proof by a recurrence
Let us show by a recurrence that:
$$ \forall z \in \mathbb{C}, \enspace \forall n \in \mathbb{Z},$$$$ \arg(z^n) = n \cdot \arg(z) \qquad (S_n) $$-
Calculating the first term
$$ z = |z| \cdot \left(\cos(\theta) + i \hspace{0.2em} \sin(\theta) \right) $$$$ z^0 = |z|^0.\left(\cos(0 \times \theta) + isin( 0 \times \theta) \right) $$$$ 1 = 1 \times ( 1 + 0) $$Thus, \((S_0)\) is true.
-
Inductive step
-
With an exponent \( n \) in the natural numbers set \( (n \in \mathbb{N}) \)
Let \( k \in \mathbb{N} \) be a nutral number.
Let us assume that the statement \((S_k)\) is true for all \( k \), and let us verify if it is also the case for \((S_{k + 1})\).
If it is so, we should obtain as a result that:
$$ \arg(z^{k+1}) = (k+1) . \arg(z) \qquad (S_{k + 1}) $$Consequently, let us calculate \(z^{k+1}\):
$$ z^{k+1} = |z|^{k+1}.\left(\cos(\theta) + i \hspace{0.2em} \sin(\theta) \right)^{k+1} $$But, we know that the argument of a product is the sum of the product's factors of this product:
$$ \forall z, z' \in \hspace{0.04em} \mathbb{C}^2, $$$$ \arg( z z') = \arg(z) + \arg(z') $$So in our case that,
$$ \arg(z^{k+1}) = \arg( z . z^k) = \arg(z) + \arg(z^k) $$$$ \arg(z^{k+1}) = \arg(z) + \arg(z) + \arg(z^{k-1}) $$And so on until:
$$ \arg\left(z^{k+1}\right) = (k+1).\arg(z) $$Thus, \((S_{k + 1})\) is true in the natural numbers set \( \mathbb{N}\).
Let us now proove it backwards.
-
With an exponent \( n \) in the natural integers set \( (n \in \mathbb{Z}) \)
Let \( k \in \mathbb{Z} \) be an integer.
Let us assume that the statement \((S_k)\) is true for all \( k \), and let us verify if it is also the case for \((P_{k - 1})\).
If it is so, we should obtain as a result that:
$$ \arg(z^{k-1}) = (k-1) . \arg(z) \qquad (P_{k - 1}) $$Calculating now \(z^{k-1}\), we do have:
$$ z^{k-1} = \frac{z^k}{z} $$But, we know that the argument of a quotient of two complex numbers is the difference of arguments of these numbers:
$$ \forall z \in \mathbb{C}, \enspace \forall z' \in \mathbb{C^*},$$$$ \arg\left(\frac{z}{z'}\right) = \arg(z) -\arg(z') $$So that,
$$ \arg(z^{k-1}) = \arg\left( \frac{z^k}{z} \right) = \arg(z^k) - \arg(z) $$$$ \arg(z^{k-1}) = k.\arg(z) - \arg(z) $$$$ \arg(z^{k-1}) = (k-1).\arg(z) $$Thus, \((P_{k - 1})\) is true for the integers set \( \mathbb{Z}\).
-
-
Conclusion
The statement \((S_n)\) is true for its first term \(n_0 = 0\) and it is hereditary from terms to terms for all \(n \in \mathbb{Z}\), increasingly and decreasingly.
Thus, by the recurrence principle, this is true for all \(n \in \mathbb{Z}\).
-
And finally, as a result we do have,
Conjugates\(: \overline{z}\)
Conjugate of a sum
Let us write the complex numbers \( z_1, z_2 \) under their algebraic form.
Performing their sum, we do have:
Now, applying the conjugate of it:
And finally,
In the same way,
Conjugate of a product
Let us write the complex numbers \( z_1, z_2 \) under their algebraic form.
Performing their product, we do have:
Now, applying the conjugate of it:
Let us now calculate the product \( \overline{z_1}. \overline{z_2} \) separately:
After having calculated both expressions \( (3) \) and \( (4) \), we notice that they are equals:
As a result we do have,
Conjugate of a quotient
Let us write the complex numbers \( z \) and \( \overset{-}{z} \) under their algebraic form.
Performing their quotient, we do have:
Multiplying both numerator and denominator by the denominator's conjugate,
Thanks to the property of a complex number mutliplied by its conjugate , we do have:
So in our case,
Then, developping the numerator,
Now, applying the conjugate of it:
Let us now calculate the quotient \( \frac{\overline{z_1}}{ \overline{z_2}} \) separately:
In the same way as as above,
After having calculated both expressions \( (5) \) and \( (6) \), we notice that they are equals:
And finally,
Complex number multiplied by its conjugate
Let us write the complex numbers \( z \) and \( \overset{-}{z} \) under their algebraic form.
Let us calculate their product:
We know from the the third quadratic remarkable identity that:
So in our case,
And finally,
Conjugate of a complex number raised to an integer power
Let us write the complex numbers \( z \) under its trigonometric form.
Calculating \( z^n \), we do have:
But we know from the Moivre's formula that:
Then, we can now write that:
Let us now apply the conjugate of it:
Furthermore, we know from the property of the modulus of the conjugate that:
Let us now calculate \( (\overline{z})^n \) seperately, starting from \( \overline{z} \).
With the Moivre's formula again, we do have:
After having calculated both expressions \( (7) \) et \( (8) \), we notice that they are equals:
And as a result,
Back to top